CaptainChip
Saintly
[M0n:1408]
New MS Paint sucks.
Posts: 2,972
|
Post by CaptainChip on Dec 23, 2008 10:16:54 GMT -5
PS3 Vs Xbox.
PS3 Pros: Free online, a few great exclusives, controller is good for fighting games (Mono y mono fighting games, not shoot 'em ups).
Xbox Pros: Has a lot of great exclusives, a lot more DLC, and the controller is great for shoot 'em ups and some other genres.
PS3 Cons: Not many exclusives, not much DLC, Expensive.
Xbox Cons: RROD (although, every console has a way of pissing themselves and dying)... I can't think of too much more.
Personally, I think Xbox 360 > PS3, but I haven't played the PS3 much, so I dunno too much about it to form a true opinion.
|
|
Dognapalm
Lurker
[M0n:500]
temp incarnate
Posts: 112
|
Post by Dognapalm on Dec 26, 2008 13:32:18 GMT -5
PS3 Vs Xbox. PS3 Cons: Not many exclusives, not much DLC, Expensive. . I wouldn't say that the PS3 doesn't have many exclusive games.
|
|
|
Post by Deadly Virus on Dec 26, 2008 16:57:37 GMT -5
Now for my serious opinion:
All consoles are awesome, I have all 3 of them and a gaming PC and I've had great fun on every one. Fanboys can go to hell.
|
|
|
Post by benavides20 on Jan 17, 2009 21:42:49 GMT -5
ok try this.
i got 300$ for my brithday, should i buy a 360?
|
|
|
Post by Ele Mantel on Jan 25, 2009 21:47:23 GMT -5
PS3 Vs Xbox. Xbox Cons: I can't think of too much more. Costs money to play online. Doesn't have built-in wifi, so you have to spend another 100$ on that. Disks are scratched easier. From what I've heard, not as good graphics(not sure on this.) You have to plug it into a TV. (You get a cookie if you understand the refrence)[line5]
|
|
jushiwah
Newbie
[M0n:-20]
BELEIVE...LOLZ...
Posts: 52
|
Post by jushiwah on Jan 25, 2009 22:11:14 GMT -5
PS3 Vs Xbox. Xbox Cons: I can't think of too much more. Costs money to play online. Doesn't have built-in wifi, so you have to spend another 100$ on that. Disks are scratched easier. From what I've heard, not as good graphics(not sure on this.) You have to plug it into a TV. (You get a cookie if you understand the refrence)[line5] Costs money to play online. (Because the connection isn't only awesome, it doesn't lag to the point where it's unplayable like some consoles I know, for only 60 bucks a year (5 bucks a month). That's pretty damn fair.) Doesn't have built-in wifi, so you have to spend another 100$ on that. (I'll give you that, if you don't have your router nearby) Disks are scratched easier. (Never heard that one before, but if it's true, how come I rent from blockbuster all the time but have never played a rented game that crashed?) From what I've heard, not as good graphics(not sure on this.) (You're right about that, but it's not so much better that a casual gamer would notice a large difference aside from games designed to have awesome graphics only for the PS3 like motorstorm and stuff) You have to plug it into a TV. (You get a cookie if you understand) (I do, and its delicious I might add, but I don't think that's all that more convenient) I'm not a fanboy, the PS3 kicks ass, I'm just defending the 360 on those points.
|
|