|
Post by Psibat on Nov 23, 2009 10:57:44 GMT -5
Hey, can I get a re-rate? Are you sure you want that? Think about it, if someone rates you to stay the level you're at the average get's closer to your current rating, so when you really do improve, it will take more people to vote you up than people who decided to vote you down. And if someone rates you twice to stay in the same rating on 2 different occasions and both are counted as 1 each it means that it may be impossible for you to go up a rating unless we get a whole load new members, y'see?
|
|
|
Post by drychris1337 on Nov 23, 2009 11:01:12 GMT -5
Hey, can I get a re-rate? Are you sure you want that? Think about it, if someone rates you to stay the level you're at the average get's closer to your current rating, so when you really do improve, it will take more people to vote you up than people who decided to vote you down. And if someone rates you twice to stay in the same rating on 2 different occasions and both are counted as 1 each it means that it may be impossible for you to go up a rating unless we get a whole load new members, y'see? Oh great, I want a re-rate and I have to wait for some luck to rain down on me. Nevermind. *sigh*
|
|
|
Post by Zarth on Nov 23, 2009 11:20:11 GMT -5
What raiting are you supposed to be in right now, DC? because on thel ist your at Average low....
|
|
|
Post by drychris1337 on Nov 23, 2009 12:47:00 GMT -5
What raiting are you supposed to be in right now, DC? because on thel ist your at Average low.... Well, I can't nominate myself for a rating...the only thing I can do is ask for a re-rate if I don't agree on where I am...and Psi already told me about the whole re-rate thing...*sigh*
|
|
|
Post by Zarth on Nov 23, 2009 12:48:51 GMT -5
What raiting are you supposed to be in right now, DC? because on thel ist your at Average low.... Well, I can't nominate myself for a rating...the only thing I can do is ask for a re-rate if I don't agree on where I am...and Psi already told me about the whole re-rate thing...*sigh* yeeeaaa... well, I would rate you as average tier for now... (since well, your at ave low right now and you have gotten better during the tourny and stuff...)
|
|
Hawshman
Apprentice
The Jokers Minion[M0n:5360]
Imma ROFL Your Copter C:
Posts: 237
|
Post by Hawshman on Dec 17, 2009 17:55:46 GMT -5
I would like to put a vote in for weedle for average-low tier. check his art out in me and psibats grudge.
|
|
DaringVonContra
Saintly
ONLY THE MANLIEST MEN WEAR PINK!![M0n:-4658]
I will fucking murder you
Posts: 2,583
|
Post by DaringVonContra on Jan 1, 2010 19:54:47 GMT -5
How would I be rated currently? I believe I made a vast improvement on my art recently.
|
|
|
Post by Ele Mantel on Jan 17, 2010 12:52:55 GMT -5
robotkilla MoAT Balto MoAT Rabies MoAT snakeskull high tier
|
|
|
Post by NG-master the II on Jan 17, 2010 15:12:27 GMT -5
Is this thing even updated anymore? :c Also, someone please put me somewhere on the list.
|
|
|
Post by Gront on Jan 18, 2010 21:58:31 GMT -5
Is this thing even updated anymore? :c UUUUUUUUHHHHHHHH... Maybe?
|
|
|
Post by rabiesisme on Jan 19, 2010 12:16:55 GMT -5
I haven't drawn anything in so long, I think I should be in that particular tier if that still exists. Or maybe I imagined it?
|
|
Hat Salesman
Hero
Hey hey mama, said the way you move[M0n:-6104]
Well, hello there.
Posts: 3,131
|
Post by Hat Salesman on Jan 22, 2010 21:06:03 GMT -5
I think we should delete this thread and start over. Less wading through big piles of shit.
|
|
charlie
Skin Making
[M0n:2225]
pwof
Posts: 758
|
Post by charlie on Jan 22, 2010 21:11:35 GMT -5
requestan backup rerank
|
|
|
Post by NG-master the II on Jan 23, 2010 0:18:09 GMT -5
Well we could just lock it, since I really like reading the old posts here, lol.
|
|
SwordKill
Newbie
Backseat Mod Mastar[M0n:182]
Dress sense matters
Posts: 85
|
Post by SwordKill on Jan 23, 2010 4:59:47 GMT -5
I think we should delete this thread and start over. Less wading through big piles of shit.Fixed.
|
|
|
Post by Psibat on May 2, 2010 15:38:05 GMT -5
Shackles is very high, at least.
|
|
|
Post by Gront on May 5, 2010 1:44:19 GMT -5
I think we should delete this thread and start over. Less wading through big piles of shit.Fixed. While deleting would be a little excessive, I'm with SK on this one. I haven't updated the list in months, and aside from Psi's most recent ranking, no one's offered ratings in months. What do you guys say we lock this thread and move on?
|
|
|
Post by Zarth on May 5, 2010 9:22:44 GMT -5
While deleting would be a little excessive, I'm with SK on this one. I haven't updated the list in months, and aside from Psi's most recent ranking, no one's offered ratings in months. What do you guys say we lock this thread and move on? No, it must be destroyed!
|
|
|
Post by John12346 on May 5, 2010 13:28:05 GMT -5
Well, I'm fine with taking this thread down and all.
|
|
|
Post by Gront on May 5, 2010 14:01:17 GMT -5
I think that destroying the thread is like destroying a key part of our history, though. I say we lock it and watch it slowly fade into obscurity.
|
|
|
Post by Psibat on May 5, 2010 14:13:45 GMT -5
NOOOOOO YOU MUSTN'T!!!!!!!!! I MUST REACH VERY HIGH TIER! I MUST REACH IT BEFORE IT CLOSES!!!!
|
|
Hat Salesman
Hero
Hey hey mama, said the way you move[M0n:-6104]
Well, hello there.
Posts: 3,131
|
Post by Hat Salesman on May 5, 2010 15:23:02 GMT -5
Alright, how about we change the title to Artist Tier Rankings Edition 1, lock it, unsticky it, and start Edition 2?
I like having some idea of where I'm at compared to others.
|
|
|
Post by Gront on May 5, 2010 15:31:19 GMT -5
Alright, how about we change the title to Artist Tier Rankings Edition 1, lock it, unsticky it, and start Edition 2? I like having some idea of where I'm at compared to others. IN that case, we'd have to modify the system we're using. I feel like our simple, one-dimensional scale blows. Any suggestions?
|
|
Hat Salesman
Hero
Hey hey mama, said the way you move[M0n:-6104]
Well, hello there.
Posts: 3,131
|
Post by Hat Salesman on May 5, 2010 15:54:58 GMT -5
Have the artist being ranked post intended style and, possibly, flaws that they themselves have noticed?
Also, point out what made you not like someone's art, whether it be the style itself, or some consistent flaws.
|
|
|
Post by Zarth on May 5, 2010 16:07:53 GMT -5
Why not make a board all on its own and at the end of every month or so, the mods make a thread or something to start a vote for all the active members on SPB.
It wouldn't be down through a poll though. But a written out list and every person has a vote on where they want that person to be.
Sort of like this:
LIST OF NOMINEES:
Grent Psi bat Grimscott Robotkilla Shackles Ghost Drychris destructin (and so on)
Then what each person would do is vote on where they would want these people. Say psi bat voted for grim to be in Moat. That would count as one vote for that place. but if that vote is out numbered, then the majority of the voters who want her in another area would win, and she would be in that category until the next vote, which would be at the beginning of the next month.
Grimscott gained 3 votes for MOAT, but 5 for very high, so she’ll be placed in very high until beginning of the next month
And when there’s a vote that’s coming up, a mod could send out a mass pm to remind everyone to cast a vote (and to keep the place active so that it won’t die out like this one.)But at the end of each month, a new thread would be created to keep the place organized.
Everyone only gets on vote per casting, and you can’t vote for your self.
May 1st 2010 artist tier vote casting
June 1st 2010 artist tier vote casting
And so on.
this is more of a way to organize it.
well. thats my idea.
one other thing. the votes would last for the frist 5 days of that month, then the thread is locked to stop aany further voting.
|
|
|
Post by Gront on May 5, 2010 16:10:38 GMT -5
Have the artist being ranked post intended style and, possibly, flaws that they themselves have noticed? Also, point out what made you not like someone's art, whether it be the style itself, or some consistent flaws. Unfortunately, that would requre us to say more than "USERNAME RANK" and , as we've all seen, that doesn't go well. It's not the method of ranking that needs to change, Zarth; it's the actual rankings themselves. Your plan is just as one-dimensional as the one we currently use.
|
|
|
Post by destructin on May 5, 2010 16:16:00 GMT -5
What I think he means Zarth is "No MoAT, Shit Tier, average etc."
Though, idk how to make up a new system, maybe with pros and cons as list.
No more whos better than who, just pros and cons, good things about a certain person's art, and the not so good things.
|
|
|
Post by Zarth on May 5, 2010 16:17:20 GMT -5
Have the artist being ranked post intended style and, possibly, flaws that they themselves have noticed? Also, point out what made you not like someone's art, whether it be the style itself, or some consistent flaws. Unfortunately, that would requre us to say more than "USERNAME RANK" and , as we've all seen, that doesn't go well. It's not the method of ranking that needs to change, Zarth; it's the actual rankings themselves. Your plan is just as one-dimensional as the one we currently use. What about basing it off of drawings that were done the month before, then compare them with the persons current drawing, and then have the community vote on whether or not if said person has gotten any better? And be serious about it, if they do half assed shit on purpose, it’ll cost them.
|
|
SwordKill
Newbie
Backseat Mod Mastar[M0n:182]
Dress sense matters
Posts: 85
|
Post by SwordKill on May 5, 2010 16:17:58 GMT -5
The whole idea of artist tier rankings need to be punched in the face, kicked into the gutter, curb stomped, then kicked in the head for good measure. It needs to die.
I am 100% for locking and deleting this thread.
|
|
|
Post by Zarth on May 5, 2010 16:21:33 GMT -5
What I think he means Zarth is "No MoAT, Shit Tier, average etc." Though, idk how to make up a new system, maybe with pros and cons as list. No more whos better than who, just pros and cons, good things about a certain person's art, and the not so good things. Yea, don't base their the rankings off of whos better than who, but rather their art alone and how they developed during that month. and instead of the MOAt and things, why not base it off of a number from 1 to 10 (or 100... or higher...) highest number being awesome, loswest number meaning not so good.
|
|