|
Post by Ele Mantel on Oct 16, 2010 17:22:55 GMT -5
Because maybe I'll actually be noticed as being here from the start! Whats great about that?
|
|
|
Post by RobotKilla on Oct 16, 2010 17:24:48 GMT -5
Because maybe I'll actually be noticed as being here from the start! Whats great about that? No more neglect?
|
|
|
Post by Metal Chao on Oct 16, 2010 18:50:19 GMT -5
I think it's a silly idea but I'm just a new person loser so obviously according to you I'm not important enough to listen to
|
|
|
Post by Shackles on Oct 16, 2010 18:57:50 GMT -5
I think it's a silly idea but I'm just a new person loser so obviously according to you I'm not important enough to listen to Agreed, I like the idea that if you were in the original thread, you're a veteran, and anyone else is a newbie even if they've been here for 2 and a half years. Alpha-Omega titles are cliche.
|
|
|
Post by Metal Chao on Oct 16, 2010 19:07:30 GMT -5
Joining earlier just means that you're able to consistently visit a message board for a long period of time (or not, in some cases, apparently), it's no great measure of goodness or aptitude. Sure, people tend to improve over time but that's no guarantee. Someone who joins and is immediately lauded as the best thing to ever grace the forum, as a kindly person who gives excellent advice, posts regularly in matches and draws the most beautiful works of art would still be alloted the lowest rank. An unwanted troll who spits out the occasional stunted stick figure and posts useless garbage all over the place but was lucky enough to post a single crudely crafted phallus in the original thread (not saying there are any, but if there were ) would still be given the highest title and use it to lord it over the new meat. If you want ranks then they should be based on degree of participation and effort, rather than some arbritrary value like join date or post count. That sort of stuff is completely meaningless and only creates a rift of contention between old and new members. I should know, we've done similar sort of things often enough on my own board, sorting people by join date or popularity with a select group of member or artistic skill, and its never really ended well for anyone.
|
|
charlie
Skin Making
[M0n:2225]
pwof
Posts: 758
|
Post by charlie on Oct 16, 2010 19:18:17 GMT -5
^^ I LIKE THIS GUY
|
|
|
Post by destructin on Oct 16, 2010 19:19:12 GMT -5
^ Agree x123425
DAMMIT MVGGGG
|
|
|
Post by retyuoligkl on Oct 16, 2010 20:50:40 GMT -5
Holy shit I don't think better words can be formed MC
|
|
|
Post by McJesus on Oct 16, 2010 21:58:50 GMT -5
btw grent has already figured out ranks posters in the original thread: legends (admit it, no one bad has stuck around for long) current posters: veterans just saying.
|
|
Kromax
Landlord
Why are you reading this?[M0n:-2167]
Six pronged dick
Posts: 1,206
|
Post by Kromax on Oct 17, 2010 21:23:14 GMT -5
Yeah I realize the system was dumb and I really regret posting it or even asking the question
|
|
|
Post by destructin on Oct 17, 2010 22:26:35 GMT -5
I got it:
Admins: people that are admins
Mods: people that are mods
Members: people that are members
|
|
Hat Salesman
Hero
Hey hey mama, said the way you move[M0n:-6104]
Well, hello there.
Posts: 3,131
|
Post by Hat Salesman on Oct 17, 2010 22:29:55 GMT -5
People should be titled by community vote, with a little twist.
So some people could be titled Veteran Troll, Legendary Average Joe, Newbie Cool Cat, etc.
|
|
Candy Biu
Skin Making
Candy fiction[M0n:120]
Sweetest of them all!
Posts: 519
|
Post by Candy Biu on Oct 17, 2010 22:33:52 GMT -5
or we could keep user's ranks for that
|
|
|
Post by Zarth on Nov 26, 2010 16:25:51 GMT -5
Hey grent, any updates on the site?
|
|
|
Post by retyuoligkl on Nov 26, 2010 16:30:14 GMT -5
There is a big unfixable bug Progress has been halted
|
|
|
Post by Zarth on Nov 26, 2010 16:31:15 GMT -5
There is a big unfixable bug Progress has been halted Hey dude, shutup. thanks.
|
|
|
Post by retyuoligkl on Nov 26, 2010 16:32:06 GMT -5
uhm ok Grent will tell you the same thing
|
|
|
Post by Gront on Nov 26, 2010 18:09:04 GMT -5
Unfixable? Hardly. But it would require me to devote more time than I currently have to it, seeing as finals are coming up for me. Perhaps I'll fix it as a Christmas present for you guys?
|
|
|
Post by destructin on Nov 26, 2010 18:18:51 GMT -5
YESYESYES
|
|
|
Post by retyuoligkl on Nov 26, 2010 18:20:40 GMT -5
Unfixable? Hardly. But it would require me to devote more time than I currently have to it, seeing as finals are coming up for me. Perhaps I'll fix it as a Christmas present for you guys? unfixable as in, right now, it's not getting fixed but yeah i think that would be a great Christmas present
|
|
|
Post by Zarth on Dec 31, 2010 0:58:32 GMT -5
Unfixable? Hardly. But it would require me to devote more time than I currently have to it, seeing as finals are coming up for me. Perhaps I'll fix it as a Christmas present for you guys? way to go in giving us false hopes :c
|
|
|
Post by destructin on Dec 31, 2010 1:01:15 GMT -5
Unfixable? Hardly. But it would require me to devote more time than I currently have to it, seeing as finals are coming up for me. Perhaps I'll fix it as a Christmas present for you guys? way to go in giving us false hopes :c Does near completion not give you hope? He went BEYOND fixing a bug.
|
|
|
Post by Gront on Dec 31, 2010 1:01:29 GMT -5
Unfixable? Hardly. But it would require me to devote more time than I currently have to it, seeing as finals are coming up for me. Perhaps I'll fix it as a Christmas present for you guys? way to go in giving us false hopes :c Whine bitch moan. I fixed the bug, I just don't want to release anything until there's something for you guys to do other than just sign up.
|
|
|
Post by Gront on Jan 1, 2011 16:17:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by destructin on Jan 1, 2011 16:26:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by retyuoligkl on Jan 1, 2011 16:27:09 GMT -5
oh fuck me, i need to update that Rety side thingy
|
|
|
Post by Psibat on Jan 1, 2011 17:10:47 GMT -5
Was the first one that gunsmith vs bloodlust thing?
teehee
|
|
|
Post by destructin on Jan 1, 2011 17:16:08 GMT -5
second then :\
that is not part of the website
|
|
|
Post by Psibat on Jan 1, 2011 17:33:58 GMT -5
second then :\ that is not part of the websiteyay fifth image
|
|
|
Post by McJesus on Jan 1, 2011 19:11:18 GMT -5
i can't stress how well the character sides look.
|
|