|
|
Post by Ele Mantel on Feb 25, 2008 14:21:35 GMT -5
In the ART forum thing, you ARE allowed to double post, because you might want to bump the thread with a new pic, but no one commented on your last pic so you are forced to double post, that is fine.
Yeah.
Thats about it.
I will add this to the original art rules thread after most people have seen it.
|
|
|
|
Post by bulet on Feb 25, 2008 14:31:37 GMT -5
so basicly double-posting is alowed for pics or just bumping. shouldnt bump posts be deleted like any others?  |
|
|
|
Post by kevmcg1 on Feb 25, 2008 14:32:46 GMT -5
so basicly double-posting is alowed for pics or just bumping. shouldnt bump posts be deleted like any others? If you delete the bumping post then the pic inside that post will be deleted too...  |
|
|
|
Post by bulet on Feb 25, 2008 14:39:23 GMT -5
so basicly double-posting is alowed for pics or just bumping. shouldnt bump posts be deleted like any others? If you delete the bumping post then the pic inside that post will be deleted too... but he said bumps WITHOUT pics are alowed. that seems strage. or did i misunderstand.(ithink i misunderstud  ) |
|
|
|
Post by kevmcg1 on Feb 25, 2008 14:46:14 GMT -5
If you delete the bumping post then the pic inside that post will be deleted too... but he said bumps WITHOUT pics are alowed. that seems strage. or did i misunderstand.(ithink i misunderstud ) 'you ARE allowed to double post, because you might want to bump the thread with a new pic' Just making everything clear for you Bulet. |
|
|
|
Post by Grimscott on Feb 25, 2008 16:11:48 GMT -5
Thanks, this is going to be really helpful.
|
|
|
|
Post by John12346 on May 8, 2008 20:59:22 GMT -5
Elementell might be demodded, but this rule still holds water. GOT IT?
|
|
)
